Whistleblower Protection Authority Bill 2025 (No. 2)

High-Level Summary
The Whistleblower Protection Authority Bill 2025 (No. 2) proposes to establish an independent statutory authority dedicated to providing support, advice, and protection to whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers. The bill aims to enhance integrity by ensuring individuals feel secure when disclosing evidence of misconduct.

Summary
The bill establishes the Whistleblower Protection Authority, which includes the Whistleblower Protection Commissioner, Deputy Commissioners, and a Chief Executive Officer, among other staff. This authority will have jurisdiction over all federal whistleblower protection laws and will be empowered to receive and investigate disclosures of wrongdoing, provide guidance and support to whistleblowers, and undertake enforcement activities as necessary. Additionally, it will engage in educational activities and advise on the prevention of detrimental acts against whistleblowers. From the explanatory memo:
The Whistleblower Protection Authority will consist of a Whistleblower Protection Commissioner, Deputy Commissioners, a Chief Executive Officer and appropriately experienced and trained staff. The Bill also establishes a Whistleblower Protection Advisory Board and Parliamentary Joint Committee on the Whistleblower Protection Authority.

Argument For
Normative Bases
  1. Pro-Democracy
  2. Anti-Corruption
  3. Non-Discrimination

The bill should be supported because establishing a Whistleblower Protection Authority strengthens democratic governance by promoting transparency and accountability within public and private sectors. Whistleblowers play a critical role in exposing misconduct, and this authority will ensure they can do so with adequate protection, thereby enhancing the integrity of institutions [Judgment]. Moreover, by providing comprehensive support and guidance, the authority will help mitigate any discriminatory practices whistleblowers might face, ensuring fair treatment for all individuals making disclosures.


Argument Against
Normative Bases
  1. Propertarianism
  2. Value-Neutral / Epistemic Objection

The bill should be opposed because the establishment of a new statutory authority could lead to unnecessary bureaucratic expansion, potentially burdening taxpayers and diverting resources from other critical areas. While the intention is to protect whistleblowers, there is a risk of overreach, where the authority could interfere with private sector operations in ways that might harm property rights and business interests [Judgment]. Additionally, the functions of the authority could be integrated into existing bodies rather than creating a new entity, thus avoiding redundancy in the governmental framework.


Date:

2025-02-11

Status:

Before Senate

Sponsor:

POCOCK, Sen David; LAMBIE, Sen Jacqui

Portfolio:

Unspecified

Categories:

Anti-Corruption, Democratic Institutions, Discrimination / Human Rights

Timeline:
11/02/2025

Comments (0)