1. Egalitarianism
2. Pro-Democracy
3. Environmentalism

The bill should be supported because it addresses critical housing shortages and affordability issues, which are essential for ensuring equitable access to housing for all Australians. By establishing the HAFF, the government is creating a sustainable funding source to support the construction of 30,000 social and affordable homes, which aligns with egalitarian principles by improving equality in housing access [Judgment]. Furthermore, the independent advisory council enhances democratic governance by ensuring housing policies are well-informed and effectively address public needs. The focus on improving housing for Indigenous communities and vulnerable groups also promotes social justice and inclusion.

1. Propertarianism
2. Legal Principle

The bill should be opposed because it could lead to increased government intervention in the housing market, potentially disrupting property rights and market dynamics. The establishment of a large fund like the HAFF might involve significant administrative costs and inefficiencies [Judgment]. Additionally, the creation of a new advisory council could duplicate existing efforts and create bureaucratic redundancies, possibly leading to legal complexities in housing regulations. There is also a concern about the long-term fiscal impact of the fund, including the risk of mismanagement and reduced accountability in public spending [Judgment].