1. Environmentalism
2. Utilitarian Ground Truth

The bill should be supported because it aligns with Australia's environmental goals by promoting low-emission vehicles, thus contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Extending the FBT exemption for PHEVs is a pragmatic approach to promoting their adoption, which is crucial for transitioning to a sustainable transport sector. The bill also provides economic benefits by stimulating market growth and supporting the automotive industry. As PHEVs address range anxiety, they serve as an effective interim solution to encourage the shift towards fully electric vehicles, thereby maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm to the environment.

1. Propertarianism
2. Hobbesianism

The bill should be opposed because extending tax exemptions for PHEVs could be seen as an unnecessary government intervention in the market, which could distort economic incentives and favor certain industries over others. This could lead to a misallocation of resources, as businesses might be encouraged to invest in PHEVs rather than exploring other innovative solutions that could be more sustainable in the long term. Additionally, while addressing range anxiety, PHEVs still rely on fossil fuels, and extending their tax benefits might delay the full transition to zero-emission vehicles, thus undermining efforts to achieve long-term environmental goals [Judgment].