The Bill modernizes the OSA to enable the eSafety Commissioner regulatory enforcement powers over and insight into the systems and processes operated by digital platforms, similar to those provided to the authorities of the United Kingdom and European Union via the Online Safety Act 2021 and Digital Services Act respectively.
The bill should be supported because it ensures that digital platforms take responsibility for the potential harms their systems can cause, thereby promoting a safer online environment for users. By shifting the duty of care to the platforms, the bill supports the principle of non-discrimination, ensuring that vulnerable groups such as children and victims of gender-based violence are protected [Judgment]. Furthermore, it enhances democratic processes by requiring transparency and accountability, thus preventing manipulation of public opinion and electoral processes [Judgment]. The bill's preventative measures align with utilitarian principles by maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm caused by digital platforms.
The bill should be opposed because it could infringe on the freedom of expression by imposing stringent controls on the content shared on digital platforms. While aiming to protect users, it might lead to over-censorship, thus stifling free speech and limiting diverse viewpoints [Judgment]. Additionally, the financial burden and regulatory compliance costs for digital platforms might discourage innovation and investment in Australia’s digital economy. This could ultimately harm the competitive landscape and reduce the diversity of available services [Judgment].
2024-11-25
Not Proceeding
DANIEL, Zoe, MP
Unspecified
Media / Advertising, Discrimination / Human Rights, Democratic Institutions