The bill ensures that PEP11 and King Island cease to be in force two months after Royal Assent, prohibits applications for the Otway Basin, and prevents the Joint Authority from considering or granting permits, consents, or licenses associated with these areas.The proposed amendments include specific prohibitions against inviting or considering applications for these permits, ensuring no new exploration activities can commence in these critical areas.
The bill should be supported because it prioritizes the protection of marine ecosystems and coastal economies from the detrimental effects of offshore petroleum exploration, such as pollution and seismic testing, which threaten biodiversity and local fishing communities. By preventing new exploration activities, the bill aligns with the global responsibility to combat climate change and protect human rights, including the right to a healthy environment and sustainable living conditions [Judgment]. Furthermore, the bill reflects the precautionary principle, which emphasizes taking preventive action in the face of uncertainty to avoid serious or irreversible environmental harm.
The bill should be opposed because it may limit economic opportunities associated with offshore petroleum resources, which could contribute to national energy independence and economic growth. Restricting exploration can also negatively impact industries related to oil and gas, leading to potential job losses and economic downturns in regions that rely on these sectors [Judgment]. Moreover, the bill's prohibitions might be seen as an overreach, limiting the ability of the government and private enterprises to utilize natural resources effectively.
2022-08-04
Before Senate
WHISH-WILSON, Sen Peter
Unspecified
Climate Change / Environment, Energy Policy, Discrimination / Human Rights