1. Non-Discrimination
2. Discrimination / Human Rights

The bill should be supported because it aligns Australia’s immigration detention practices with international human rights standards, thereby upholding the dignity and human rights of non-citizens [Judgment]. By introducing a 90-day limit on detention, it prevents the indefinite detention of individuals, which is a key human rights concern. The prohibition on detaining minors further reinforces the commitment to protecting vulnerable groups and ensures compliance with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

Moreover, the bill introduces oversight mechanisms, such as review by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART), which promote transparency and accountability in detention decisions, supporting a fairer and more humane system [Judgment].

1. Hobbesianism
2. National Security

The bill should be opposed because it may potentially compromise national security by limiting the government's ability to detain individuals who might pose a threat for longer periods when necessary. The 90-day limit could hinder the processing of complex cases where more time is needed to assess security risks or verify an individual's identity thoroughly [Judgment].

Additionally, the prohibition on detaining minors, while well-intentioned, could inadvertently incentivize individuals to exploit this provision by using minors to gain entry into the country, complicating border management and potentially increasing illegal immigration [Judgment].