1. Non-Discrimination
2. Legal Principle

The bill should be supported as it aims to combat illegal and unethical practices, particularly organ trafficking, which often exploits vulnerable populations and violates human rights. By collecting data on organ transplants conducted overseas, Australia can better monitor and address potential abuses, aligning with international human rights obligations [Judgment]. The enhancement of the character test serves as a deterrent against individuals involved in organ trafficking from entering or remaining in Australia, thereby upholding Australia's commitment to human rights and legal principles [Judgment].

1. Pro-Democracy
2. Value-Neutral / Epistemic Objection

One could argue against the bill on the grounds that it may infringe upon personal privacy and could lead to arbitrary visa cancellations based on suspicion rather than conviction. The requirement for travelers to disclose detailed medical information might be viewed as intrusive and not aligned with democratic values of privacy and personal autonomy [Judgment]. Additionally, the expanded character test could potentially be misused, leading to discrimination or unjust treatment of individuals who have not been legally convicted of any wrongdoing [Judgment].