Lobbying (Improving Government Honesty and Trust) Bill 2025

High-Level Summary
The bill proposes to improve transparency and integrity in government decision-making by regulating lobbying activities through a comprehensive registration system and increased disclosure requirements.

Summary
The Lobbying (Improving Government Honesty and Trust) Bill 2025 aims to enhance transparency and accountability in government by expanding the Register of Lobbyists to include professional lobbyists, in-house lobbyists, and former government representatives. From the explanatory memo:
The bill requires lobbyists to register and disclose their lobbying activities, including the topics discussed, desired outcomes, and participants involved. It prohibits unregistered lobbying and mandates the publication of Ministerial diaries to disclose meetings with stakeholders. Additionally, the bill extends the post-employment cooling-off period for former ministers and senior government officials to three years and imposes sanctions for breaches, including fines and suspension or revocation of registration.

Argument For
Normative Bases
  1. Pro-Transparency
  2. Anti-Corruption

The bill should be supported because it promotes greater transparency and accountability in government decision-making by ensuring that lobbying activities are open to public scrutiny. By requiring detailed disclosures and extending the Register of Lobbyists, the bill helps guard against undue influence from private interests, thereby protecting the integrity of democratic processes [Judgment]. Furthermore, the publication of Ministerial diaries and the extension of cooling-off periods for former officials align with international best practices to prevent conflicts of interest and foster public trust in government [Judgment].


Argument Against
Normative Bases
  1. Value-Neutral / Epistemic Objection

The bill should be opposed because the registration and reporting requirements may impose undue burdens on lobbyists, potentially stifling legitimate advocacy efforts. While transparency is important, the restrictions could limit the ability of individuals and organizations to freely express their views and engage with government representatives [Judgment]. Moreover, the increased regulatory framework might lead to unintended consequences, such as discouraging valuable input from industry experts and stakeholders who are not willing to navigate the complex registration process [Judgment].


Date:

2025-02-12

Chamber:

Senate

Status:

Before Senate

Sponsor:

POCOCK, Sen David

Portfolio:

Unspecified

Categories:

Anti-Corruption, Democratic Institutions, Discrimination / Human Rights

Timeline:
12/02/2025

Comments (0)