The Liability for Climate Change Damage (Make the Polluters Pay) Bill 2025 establishes legal liability for major fossil fuel companies, allowing individuals and governments to sue for harms attributable to climate change. It holds companies emitting over one million tonnes of greenhouse gases per year liable for loss and damage and empowers the Federal Court to award damages and injunctive relief.
The Bill applies retrospectively from 1 September 1990—the date of the first IPCC report linking fossil fuels to warming—and removes any statute of limitations on claims.
This Bill makes major emitters of greenhouse gases—defined as fossil fuel producers or coal-fired power station operators whose annual emissions exceed one million tonnes—to be liable for climate change damage occurring in Australia. It gives victims of economic loss, property damage, health costs, adaptation and mitigation expenses, and ocean-acidification impacts the right to bring actions against these companies in the Federal Court.
From the explanatory memorandum:
This Bill makes fossil fuel companies liable for climate change damage, giving victims of climate change fuelled events, such as Tropical Cyclone Alfred, the right to bring an action against thermal coal, oil and gas companies for climate change damage.
The key clauses are:
The Bill commences the day after Royal Assent (Clause 2).
The Bill enshrines the "polluter pays" principle, ensuring that major fossil fuel companies internalize the external costs of climate change and are incentivised to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Holding emitters liable for storms, droughts, sea-level rise and other harms promotes environmental stewardship and accelerates the transition to cleaner energy.
By granting clear statutory rights to compensation and injunctive relief, the Bill closes legal gaps that currently leave victims of climate-related damage without recourse. The use of Federal Court jurisdiction and flexible evidentiary rules—including scientific modelling—streamlines access to justice and ensures affected communities can obtain redress without undue procedural hurdles [Judgment].
The Bill’s retrospective liability from 1990 upends settled legal expectations, creating uncertainty for companies and investors planning long-term energy projects [Judgment]. Allocating damages based on global emission shares rather than demonstrable causal contribution risks arbitrary outcomes and subjects the Federal Court to protracted climate-attribution litigation.
By displacing established State and common law remedies, the Bill may lead to duplicative claims and inconsistent awards, overwhelming judicial capacity. The costs of litigation and potential damages could be passed on to consumers, undermining energy affordability and economic stability [Judgment].
2025-03-26
Senate
Before Senate
FARUQI, Sen Mehreen; WATERS, Sen Larissa
Unspecified
Climate Change / Environment, Democratic Institutions, Civics, Financial Regulation, Energy Policy, Legal Principle