1. Environmentalism
2. Non-Discrimination

Ending live sheep exports is consistent with environmental values as it addresses concerns about the welfare of animals during transport, which often involves long voyages under stressful and sometimes inhumane conditions. The bill aligns with the principle of non-discrimination by ensuring that sheep, regardless of age, are protected under the new regulation, promoting humane treatment for all animals. Furthermore, by setting a definitive end date, the bill provides certainty and allows farmers and businesses time to adjust to the changes, potentially fostering more sustainable and ethical farming practices [Judgment].

1. Propertarianism
2. Utilitarian Ground Truth

Opponents argue that this bill could negatively impact the agricultural economy, particularly affecting farmers and workers reliant on the live export industry. From a propertarian perspective, the bill could infringe on the rights of farmers to manage and sell their livestock as they see fit. Furthermore, the utilitarian argument suggests that the economic benefits of live sheep export, which supports livelihoods and contributes to Australia's economy, might outweigh the potential welfare gains. The transition may lead to economic hardship for those involved in the industry if alternative markets or compensation measures are not adequately established [Judgment].