Interactive Gambling Amendment (Ban on Gambling Advertisements) Bill 2024

High-Level Summary
The bill proposes to amend the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 to ban advertisements for licensed interactive wagering services across television, print, radio, and online platforms. This aims to mitigate gambling-related harm by curbing the influence of gambling promotions.

Summary
The Interactive Gambling Amendment (Ban on Gambling Advertisements) Bill 2024 amends the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 to prohibit the advertising of licensed interactive wagering services. This includes telephone and online gambling services.
From the explanatory memo: The bill will "prohibit television, print, radio and online advertising of interactive gambling services such as telephone and online gambling." Exemptions are made for certain advertisements related to gambling service employment, trade, and reducing gambling harm. The advertising ban does not apply to excluded wagering and lottery services. The bill introduces new sections and amendments to existing sections in the Interactive Gambling Act 2001, defining and enforcing penalties for the advertisement of licensed interactive wagering services. These amendments clarify what constitutes gambling advertisements and the associated penalties for broadcasting, datacasting, or publishing such advertisements in Australia.

Argument For
Normative Bases
  1. Non-Discrimination
  2. Pro-Democracy
  3. Utilitarian Ground Truth

The bill should be supported because it aims to reduce the widespread negative impacts of gambling on individuals and communities. By banning gambling advertisements, the bill seeks to protect vulnerable populations, including young people, from being influenced to engage in gambling activities that can lead to addiction and financial distress [Judgment]. This aligns with the broader public health goal of reducing gambling-related harm and promoting social welfare. Moreover, the bill supports democratic principles by responding to the majority opinion, as there is substantial public support for increased restrictions on gambling advertising [Judgment].


Argument Against
Normative Bases
  1. Propertarianism
  2. Legal Principle

The bill should be opposed because it could infringe on the freedom of expression rights of businesses in the gambling industry. Advertising is a critical component of business operations, and restricting it could lead to economic disadvantages for these companies and their employees. The limitations could be seen as disproportionate and may fail to adequately balance the interest of protecting public health with the rights of businesses to communicate about legal products [Judgment]. Additionally, there are concerns that such restrictions might drive gambling promotion underground or lead to unintended consequences, such as the rise of unregulated gambling activities.


Date:

2024-07-01

Status:

Not Proceeding

Sponsor:

SHARKIE, Rebekha, MP

Portfolio:

Unspecified

Categories:

Media / Advertising, Discrimination / Human Rights, Consumer Protection

Timeline:
01/07/2024
28/03/2025

Comments (0)