1. Anti-Corruption
2. Pro-Democracy

The bill should be supported because it aims to safeguard public funds from potential misuse due to the alleged misconduct and corruption linked to the CFMEU, which is affiliated with Cbus. By restricting investments in housing projects associated with Cbus, the bill promotes accountability and transparency in the use of taxpayer money, which is crucial for maintaining public trust in government financial management [Judgment].

Furthermore, ensuring that public funds are not invested in projects that could be influenced by entities under investigation for corruption aligns with democratic principles of fairness and probity in public spending.

1. Egalitarianism
2. Pro-Democracy

The bill should be opposed because it could unfairly penalize Cbus, a legitimate financial entity, based on allegations against its affiliate, the CFMEU, rather than proven misconduct. This pre-emptive restriction might limit Cbus's ability to contribute to necessary housing developments, which could exacerbate the housing supply crisis [Judgment].

Moreover, the bill may set a concerning precedent where financial entities are punished based on associations, which could deter investment in other critical sectors. This could hinder democratic economic participation by reducing the diversity of players in the market, thereby impacting competition and innovation in the housing sector.