1. Egalitarianism
2. Pro-Democracy
3. Non-Discrimination

Establishing the HAFF aligns with egalitarian values by directly addressing housing inequality and providing support for vulnerable populations, such as Indigenous communities and low-income workers. By increasing the supply of social and affordable housing, the fund promotes a fairer distribution of resources and opportunities.^[1]

The HAFF also supports democratic principles by ensuring that housing policies are informed by an independent advisory council, fostering transparency and accountability in decision-making. This approach helps build public trust and engagement in housing policy.^[2]

Additionally, the fund's focus on non-discrimination ensures that housing services are provided without bias, addressing the needs of women, children, and veterans at risk of homelessness.

1. ^{^}

   Based on analysis of housing needs and social impact reports.

2. ^{^}

   References to the role of advisory councils in policy development.

1. Propertarianism
2. Fiscal Responsibility

Opponents of the HAFF may argue that the establishment of such a large fund could lead to inefficiencies and misuse of taxpayer money, potentially creating dependencies on government assistance rather than encouraging self-sufficiency and market-driven solutions [Judgment].

From a propertarian perspective, there is concern that government intervention in housing markets could disrupt property rights and market dynamics, potentially leading to decreased investments in the private housing sector [Judgment].

Additionally, critics might argue that the financial burden of managing such a fund could have broader negative impacts on fiscal policy, diverting funds from other critical areas of need.