The Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Bill 2025 amends the Migration Act 1958 to remove the common-law rules of natural justice from certain removal powers and third-country reception arrangements, and to retrospectively validate those actions and specified visa decisions made before 8 November 2023. It ensures that decisions under sections 198AAA, 199C, 501M and new section 198AHAA cannot be challenged for procedural-fairness defects and that certain visa grants, refusals, cancellations and conditions remain valid despite changes in High Court jurisprudence.
This Bill amends the Migration Act 1958 by inserting new section 198AHAA and adding subsections in existing provisions to clarify that the rules of natural justice do not apply to:
Part 1 also validates, for all purposes, any acts or decisions taken before commencement that would otherwise be invalid solely for lack of procedural fairness.
Part 2 responds to the Full Court’s decision in AJN23 by validating, as always valid, all ‘relevant visa decisions’ made on or before 8 November 2023—namely the grant, refusal, cancellation or conditional adjustment of any visa—where the only legal error was reliance on the former High Court authority in Al-Kateb regarding indefinite detention. Related acts (e.g. detention under s 189 or removal under s 198) are likewise validated.
The amendments commence on Royal Assent for procedural provisions and the following day for the Schedule, and have a low financial impact. They are stated to be compatible with human-rights obligations, provided policies ensure their consistent, rights-respecting application.
The bill corrects legal uncertainty created by recent court decisions (TCXM, AJN23, NZYQ) to preserve the integrity and reliability of Australia’s migration framework. Without retrospective validation, administrative actions—such as information-sharing with foreign partners (s 198AAA), removal directions (s 199C) and third-country reception arrangements (s 198AHAA)—could be endlessly challenged, hindering timely removal and undermining public confidence in rule of law.
By explicitly removing procedural-fairness requirements from discrete removal and reception powers and validating past acts, the legislation ensures that operational decisions can proceed without delay, serving the state’s legitimate interest in maintaining orderly immigration processes and national security. It also reaffirms Parliament’s constitutional authority to clarify the scope of executive and statutory powers and to validate actions that courts have inadvertently cast into doubt.
Stripping natural-justice protections from critical migration decisions concentrates unchecked power in the executive and undermines fundamental legal safeguards. Procedural fairness exists to ensure that individuals subject to removal or information-sharing can correct errors, present evidence or claim exemptions—especially where removal directions carry criminal penalties of up to five years’ imprisonment. Removing these rights risks arbitrary and disproportionate outcomes.
Moreover, retrospective validation of decisions imposes criminal liability on conduct that may not have been unlawful at the time, breaching the principle against ex post facto punishment under Article 15 of the ICCPR. This retroactivity erodes trust in the legal system and may unlawfully convict individuals for past actions, weakening the rule of law rather than strengthening it.
2025-08-26
House of Representatives
Before House of Representatives
Unspecified
Home Affairs
Immigration, Discrimination / Human Rights