1. Environmentalism
2. Pro-Democracy
3. Non-Discrimination

This bill supports efforts to align university practices with societal values that prioritize environmental sustainability and ethical governance. By cutting financial ties with industries that degrade the environment and public health, universities can reinforce their role as leaders in promoting societal well-being and environmental stewardship. This move is likely to enhance civic engagement by aligning university policies with the democratic demand for ethical investment [Judgment]. Additionally, prohibiting individuals with conflicting interests from university boards ensures unbiased governance and equitable decision-making processes, fostering non-discrimination in university governance.

1. Propertarianism
2. Hobbesianism

Opponents of the bill may argue that it infringes on the autonomy of universities to manage their financial interests as they see fit, potentially undermining their financial stability and ability to fund research and educational programs [Judgment]. Moreover, by restricting partnerships, the bill may inadvertently reduce opportunities for beneficial collaborations that could advance educational and technological innovation. The bill's provisions may also be seen as overly restrictive, potentially leading to a chilling effect on academic and research freedom by disincentivizing industry collaboration.