Higher Education Support Amendment (Reverse Job-Ready Graduates Fee Hikes and End 50k Arts Degrees) Bill 2025

High-Level Summary
The bill proposes to repeal the job-ready graduates fee increases introduced in the 2020 Act and to end the $50,000 cap on arts degrees, restoring student contribution amounts for Law, Accounting, Administration, Economics, Commerce, Society and Culture, and Communications to their pre-2020 levels (adjusted for indexation as of 1 January 2026).

Summary

This Bill amends the Higher Education Support Act 2003 by repealing the fee increases introduced in the Higher Education Support Amendment (Job-Ready Graduates and Supporting Regional and Remote Students) Act 2020. Specifically, Item 1 in Part 1 of Schedule 1 replaces section 93-10’s table of maximum student contribution amounts for Law, Accounting, Administration, Economics, Commerce, Society and Culture, and Communications, reverting them to the amounts they would have had on 1 January 2026 if the 2020 amendments had not commenced (as indexed under Division 198). Under Item 2, these changes apply to any unit of study with a census date on or after the Bill’s commencement (the later of 1 January 2026 or the day after Royal Assent), regardless of when the course began.


Argument For
Normative Bases
  1. Egalitarianism
  2. Non-Discrimination
  3. Legal Principle [ICESCR Article 13]

Access to higher education should not depend on a student’s chosen discipline. By reversing punitive fee hikes for arts and social sciences, the Bill dismantles financial barriers that disproportionately deter students from lower-income backgrounds. This promotes equal opportunity across all fields of study, ensuring that prospective students can pursue Law, Accounting, Administration, Economics, Commerce, Society and Culture, or Communications without facing inflated debts.

Moreover, education is a public good that yields broad societal benefits beyond individual earnings. The job-ready graduates pricing model distorts student choice by privileging short-term labour market signals over long-term civic, cultural and intellectual gains [Judgment]. Restoring the original contribution rates realigns government policy with the right to education, enhancing discipline equity and supporting a diverse, well-rounded workforce.


Argument Against
Normative Bases
  1. Utilitarian Ground Truth
  2. Value-Neutral / Epistemic Objection

The job-ready graduates fee structure was designed to align student incentives with national workforce needs by pricing degrees according to estimated graduate earnings and public benefit. Repealing these hikes risks reducing enrolments in areas of high labour demand—such as STEM and regional fields—and may worsen skill shortages in critical sectors, ultimately harming overall societal welfare [Judgment].

There is limited evidence that rolling back fees will significantly boost the quality or breadth of humanities education; lower costs may increase demand, but without sufficient teaching capacity or labour market absorption, this could lead to graduate underemployment and greater taxpayer subsidies for degrees with weaker employment outcomes [Judgment]. From an epistemic standpoint, any reform should be backed by robust modelling of enrolment patterns and workforce projections before reversing a policy aimed at improving labour market alignment.


Date:

2025-11-25

Chamber:

Senate

Status:

Before Senate

Sponsor:

FARUQI, Sen Mehreen

Portfolio:

Unspecified

Categories:

Education, Social Support / Welfare, Discrimination / Human Rights

Timeline:
25/11/2025

Comments (0)