From the explanatory memo: This Bill is compatible with human rights as it engages and promotes the right to work by protecting industries dependent on the Great Australian Bight.
The bill should be supported because it aims to preserve the unique and diverse ecosystem of the Great Australian Bight, which is crucial for many marine species, including endangered whales and the Australian Sea Lion. Protecting this area from mining activities aligns with environmental conservation efforts and supports the sustainability of local economies dependent on fishing and tourism. By ensuring the area's protection, the bill promotes biodiversity and helps to mitigate climate impacts associated with drilling activities [Judgment]. Additionally, it enhances the rights to work for the communities involved in these industries by safeguarding their livelihoods.
The bill should be opposed because it potentially undermines property rights and economic opportunities by restricting mining activities that could contribute to the national economy and energy independence. By imposing strict penalties and prohibiting exploration, this legislation might deter investment in the energy sector and limit job creation in mining, which could be vital for national growth and energy security. Furthermore, the process of World Heritage Listing may impose additional constraints on the use of this natural resource, potentially stalling development projects that could benefit the nation [Judgment].
2025-02-11
Senate
Before Senate
HANSON-YOUNG, Sen Sarah
Unspecified
Climate Change / Environment, Discrimination / Human Rights, National Security