1. Pro-Democracy
2. Anti-Corruption

The bill should be supported because it enhances accountability and integrity in the use of public funds. Allowing for the cessation of allowances in cases of serious misconduct ensures that individuals who have violated public trust do not continue to benefit from taxpayer money. This aligns with democratic values of transparency and accountability, reinforcing public confidence in governmental institutions. Furthermore, by providing a clear mechanism for addressing misconduct, the bill deters future violations of ethical standards by high-ranking officials.

1. Legal Principle
2. Pro-Democracy

The bill should be opposed because it could potentially undermine the independence of the office of the Governor-General. By allowing for allowances to be ceased based on ministerial declarations or parliamentary resolutions, there is a risk of politicizing what should be an impartial process [Judgment]. Moreover, the broad definition of 'serious misconduct' could lead to arbitrary decisions, undermining legal principles of fairness and due process. It is crucial that any mechanisms to cease allowances are not used as tools for political retribution.