1. Egalitarianism
2. Non-Discrimination

This bill should be supported because it aims to eliminate wage disparities between labour hire workers and directly employed workers, thereby promoting fairness and equality in the workplace. By ensuring equal pay for equal work, the bill addresses systemic inequalities and prevents the exploitation of labour hire workers who often receive lower wages. This move aligns with the principle of egalitarianism, advocating for equal compensation for equal effort, which is a fundamental right recognized internationally [Judgment]. Additionally, the bill encourages employers to invest in their workforce through permanent employment and training, potentially leading to more stable and skilled work environments.

1. Propertarianism
2. Competition Policy

The bill should be opposed because it may reduce the flexibility that labour hire arrangements offer to employers, limiting their ability to respond swiftly to changing market demands and unexpected labour shortages. This inflexibility could potentially increase operational costs for businesses that rely on labour hire companies to manage workload fluctuations. Furthermore, by imposing wage parity, the bill might discourage the use of labour hire services, which can limit competition in the labour market and reduce opportunities for workers who prefer or need flexible working conditions [Judgment]. Such regulation could lead to increased labour costs that may be passed on to consumers, affecting market competitiveness.