The Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 overhauls the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 to deliver stronger, transparent and enforceable national environmental standards, ensure net-gain outcomes for protected matters, and streamline assessment and approval processes.
It also establishes a National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA), bolsters compliance powers and penalties, introduces bioregional planning, and codifies First Nations engagement.
The Reform Bill implements the core recommendations of the 2020 Samuel Review by amending the EPBC Act in five key areas:
Commencement of provisions is staged by proclamation or set timeframes post-Royal Assent, with transitional and application rules in Schedule 1.
Clear, enforceable standards. Legally binding National Environmental Standards will ensure consistency and predictability for both environmental outcomes and businesses, reducing ad hoc decision-making and greenwashing.
Real conservation gains. By prohibiting unacceptable impacts and requiring net-gain offsets or restoration contributions, the bill shifts the burden onto proponents to avoid irreversible harm and deliver measurable environmental improvements.
Efficient, accountable regulation. Streamlined assessment pathways and bioregional planning will cut unnecessary duplication and delays, while stronger compliance powers, environment protection orders and tougher penalties will deter non-compliance and build public trust in environmental governance.
Independent oversight and transparency. Establishing NEPA and Environment Information Australia centralises expertise, promotes open data, and embeds First Nations and scientific advice into decision-making, balancing development needs with ecological integrity.
Regulatory complexity and cost. The bill introduces new layers of standards, approvals, bioregional plans and audit regimes that will increase the time and expense of project development, potentially deterring investment in renewable energy, housing and critical minerals [Judgment].
Uncertain thresholds and judicial risk. Vague definitions of “unacceptable impacts,” net-gain requirements and radiological exposure thresholds could spawn legal challenges and inconsistent enforcement, undermining the intended certainty for industry.
Centralisation of power. Vesting broad functions in NEPA and the Minister risks politicising approvals, reducing state and local input, and creating a single point of failure for Australia’s environmental regulation.
2025-10-30
Passed Both Houses
Unspecified
Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water
Climate Change / Environment, Energy Policy