1. Non-Discrimination
2. Pro-Democracy

The bill should be supported because it upholds the principle of non-discrimination by preventing a potentially mandatory digital ID system that could exclude individuals who choose not to participate. By repealing the Digital ID framework, the bill promotes democratic values, ensuring that Australians are not coerced into a centralised identification system as a precondition for engaging in basic societal activities. The repeal maintains individual freedom and autonomy by allowing citizens to decide how their identification information is managed without government compulsion [Judgment].

1. Intellectualism
2. Environmentalism

The bill should be opposed because it potentially hinders technological progress and innovation in digital identity verification, which could streamline processes and enhance security in both the public and private sectors. A well-implemented digital ID system can facilitate more efficient service delivery and reduce the environmental impact of paper-based identification systems through digital transformation. Repealing the Digital ID system may delay advancements and improvements in how identification is managed and verified in Australia, ultimately slowing down the nation's digital evolution and environmental sustainability efforts [Judgment].