1. Non-Discrimination
2. Discrimination / Human Rights

The bill should be supported because it aligns with Australia's commitment to human rights and international conventions against forced labor and slavery. By banning goods produced through forced labor, the bill actively discourages practices that exploit vulnerable populations, including children, and perpetuate human rights abuses [Judgment]. It also sends a strong global message that Australia will not support or engage in trade that benefits from such inhumane practices, potentially prompting other nations to follow suit and strengthening international efforts to combat modern slavery.

1. Propertarianism
2. Utilitarian Ground Truth

Critics might argue that the bill could lead to complications in trade relations, particularly with countries where the supply chains are complex and hard to verify. Implementing such a ban could also potentially increase costs for businesses that need to ensure their imports are compliant, leading to higher prices for consumers [Judgment]. Additionally, there might be concerns about the effectiveness of enforcing the ban and whether it might inadvertently harm workers in countries where forced labor is prevalent, by disrupting their only available economic activities.