1. Non-Discrimination
2. Pro-Democracy
3. Legal Principle

The bill should be supported because it addresses a critical issue of racial discrimination, aligning with Australia's commitment to eliminating racial discrimination as per Article 2 of the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). By establishing a Commission to investigate and recommend measures to combat antisemitism, the bill promotes equality and protects the rights of Jewish students and staff, ensuring they have safe access to education and campus life [Judgment]. It also strengthens democratic values by fostering an inclusive and respectful academic environment, where all individuals can express themselves without fear of harassment or discrimination. The Commission's findings and recommendations may lead to necessary legal and policy changes that enhance protections against antisemitism, thus upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for affected individuals.

1. Pro-Democracy
2. Same as Opponent

The bill should be opposed because it places undue emphasis on antisemitism at universities, potentially at the expense of addressing other forms of discrimination that may also be pervasive and harmful. A Commission focused solely on antisemitism might divert resources and attention from broader efforts to combat discrimination in all its forms, which could undermine the broader educational and societal goals of equality and inclusivity [Judgment]. Furthermore, granting the Commission powers equivalent to a Royal Commission could lead to an overreach of authority and excessive scrutiny that may stifle free speech and academic freedom on campuses, impacting the democratic discourse that universities are meant to foster [Judgment]. Instead, existing mechanisms within universities and broader anti-discrimination frameworks could be strengthened to address these issues more comprehensively.