From the explanatory memo: 'The Coalition's 2024 Bill seeks to reverse these trends by re-establishing the ABCC with the strong powers it previously held under the BCII Act.'
The bill should be supported as it aims to restore a regulatory body that has historically contributed to improved industry standards and reduced industrial disputes, thereby promoting a stable and lawful environment in the building sector. Re-establishing the ABCC is expected to enhance compliance and accountability, which aligns with the principles of a democratic society where rule of law is respected and upheld. Furthermore, given the necessity of authority and regulation for societal stability, the reinstatement of the ABCC is crucial to maintaining order and efficiency, ultimately benefiting the economy and public welfare by potentially lowering construction costs and project delays [Judgment].
The bill should be opposed because the re-establishment of the ABCC may lead to an imbalance of power that disproportionately affects workers and unions, potentially infringing on workers' rights to organize and take industrial action. This could undermine egalitarian principles by prioritizing corporate interests over those of individual workers and unions. Additionally, the strong regulatory powers granted to the ABCC could be perceived as discriminatory, targeting specific union activities and stifling legitimate industrial actions, which are vital for advocating fair labor practices and conditions [Judgment].
2024-08-21
Senate
Before Senate
CASH, Sen Michaelia
Unspecified
Labour, Industrial Policy, Criminal Law Reform